User Manual    [Previous]   [Next]   

W068 Destination State Not Found

Umple semantic warning issued when the destination state of a transition cannot be found

When using dot notation to define the destination state of a transition in a nested state machine (e.g. sm1.s2), then the destination state must exist, otherwise the transition will be ignored. The warning is most likely caused by a typographical error. (Note that when not using dot notation, behaviour is a bit different, and a new end state will be created by default with warning 50).
The warning can be resolved by correcting the destination state name or by creating the state.

Example

//The warning is generated due
//to the transition destination
//of e -> s3.s2a not being defined in sm
class A {
  sm {
    s1 {
      e -> s3.s2a;
    }
    s2 {
      s2a {
      }
    }
  }
}
      

Load the above code into UmpleOnline

Solution to The Above So the Message No Longer Appears

//The following example does
//not generate the warning
//as s2.s2a is found in sm
class A {
  sm {
    s1 {
      e -> s2.s2a;
    }
    s2 {
      s2a {
      }
    }
  }
}
      

Load the above code into UmpleOnline